From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:11:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v8 6/6] clk: samsung: remove unused clock aliases and update clock flags In-Reply-To: References: <1406611711-25112-1-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> <1406611711-25112-7-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> <53D77B01.40702@gmail.com> Message-ID: <53D78F5D.60500@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 29.07.2014 14:04, Thomas Abraham wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> You can find few comments inline. >> >> On 29.07.2014 07:28, Thomas Abraham wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> @@ -714,15 +715,24 @@ static struct samsung_div_clock exynos4_div_clks[] __initdata = { >> ^^^ >> >> Keep in mind that following clocks are common for Exynos4210 and >> Exynos4x12. Have you tested this series on a board based on Exynos4212 >> or 4412 to verify that it does not break the legacy driver? (I would >> test it myself, but I am on holidays at the moment.) > > Thanks for taking time to have a look at this series. I have tested > this series with the old cpufreq driver for Exynos4412 on an > Origen4412 board and it works fine. These divider clocks are not > directly used or referenced by the legacy cpufreq driver. So I marked > them as read-only here. OK. Best regards, Tomasz