[PATCHv7 5/5] mmc: dw_mmc: replace "disable-wp" from slot's quirk to host's quirk

[jh80.chung@samsung.com (Jaehoon Chung)]

Hi, Doug.

Thanks for review.

On 07/30/2014 03:01 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Jaehoon,
> 
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Replaced the "disable-wp" into host's quirks.
>> (Because the slot-node is removed at dt-file.)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
>> Tested-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@samsung.com>
>> Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c  |   12 +++++-------
>>  include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h |    6 ++----
>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> index 1ac227c..4a4f66f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> @@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ static int dw_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>>         int gpio_ro = mmc_gpio_get_ro(mmc);
>>
>>         /* Use platform get_ro function, else try on board write protect */
>> -       if (slot->quirks & DW_MCI_SLOT_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT)
>> +       if (slot->host->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT)
> 
> It doesn't seem like it would be hard to include support for the old
> binding (and just print a warning).  Then this could land ahead of the
> device tree changes.
> 
> Generally I think we're supposed to keep support for old device trees
> if possible (except in extreme cases).
Ok, I see. I will add the Warning message like this. ("Recommend not to use the slot-node...")
Then Developers can change the device-tree, right.

Today, i will send the patch. If you have any other comment, let me know, plz.
I want to merge this patch-set into 3.16.

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
> 
> -Doug
>