From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk (Javier Martinez Canillas)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:53:24 +0200
Subject: [RFC 5/5] ARM: dts: Improve Peach Pit and Pi power scheme model
In-Reply-To: <20140729172005.GW17528@sirena.org.uk>
References: <1406651339-28901-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
 <1406651339-28901-6-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
 <20140729172005.GW17528@sirena.org.uk>
Message-ID: <53D8B284.8040002@collabora.co.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 07/29/2014 07:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 06:28:59PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The DeviceTree files for the Peach Pit and Pi machines have
>> a simplistic model of the connections between the different
>> regulators since not all the tps65090 regulators get their
>> input supply voltage from the VDC. DCDC1-3, LD0-1 and fet7
>> parent supply is indded VDC but the fet1-6 get their input
>> supply from the DCDC1 and DCDC2 output voltage rails.
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
> 

Thanks.

> This *should* be independent of the rest of this series.
> 

Yes, it is independent as I explained in the cover letter. I just added in the
series since it was an RFC and I wanted you to have the complete picture.

I'll post it as an separate patch with your ack, sorry if this may cause an
inconvenience to you.

Best regards,
Javier