From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:54:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v9 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420 In-Reply-To: <53DA8D85.3050106@gmail.com> References: <1406707663-16656-1-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> <1406707663-16656-5-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> <53DA8BB9.6020702@samsung.com> <53DA8D85.3050106@gmail.com> Message-ID: <53DA90DD.6090704@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 31.07.2014 20:40, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Kukjin, > > On 31.07.2014 20:32, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> On 07/30/14 17:07, Thomas Abraham wrote: >>> The new CPU clock type allows the use of generic CPUfreq drivers. So for >>> Exynos4210/5250, switch to using generic cpufreq driver. For Exynos5420, >>> which did not have CPUfreq driver support, enable the use of generic >>> CPUfreq driver. >>> >>> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa >>> Cc: Kukjin Kim >> >> Looks good to me, >> >> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim >> >> BTW, who will handle this series? I hope see this series in 3.17. > > This series consists mostly of clock changes and it likely depends on > patches already in my for-next, so I would be inclined toward taking it > through samsung-clk tree. However, for this I would need Acks for patch > 5/6 from Viresh and for patches [1] and [2] (which are dependencies of > this series) from you. I also need to make sure that the two mentioned > patches don't have any dependencies already in your tree. > > [1] ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs > - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/21/315 > [2] ARM: dts: smdk5250: Specify MAX77686 pmic interrupt > - http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg351134.html Aha, I'm not quite sure we really want to hurry with this series for 3.17. I'd prefer it to be picked up early after 3.17-rc1 shows up to sit in linux-next for a while an be thoroughly tested on a number of boards. This would also have the advantage of having the two patches mentioned above already merged. Best regards, Tomasz