From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 09:45:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm: irq: fix the affinity when migrate a irq
In-Reply-To: <1408087917-22603-1-git-send-email-zhangwm@marvell.com>
References: <1408087917-22603-1-git-send-email-zhangwm@marvell.com>
Message-ID: <53EDC89F.4020300@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Neil,

On 15/08/14 08:31, Neil Zhang wrote:
> Commit ffde1de64012 ("irqchip: Gic: Support forced affinity setting")
> has enable the forcing cpu affinity of interrupts for gic.
>
> The current code of migrate_one_irq will pass the current affinity mask
> to irq_set_affinity with force is true, it may select the cpu being
> offlined as the target CPU again, then the interrupt won't be migrated
> correctly.
>

I had posted similar patch [1] a while ago and the discussion[2] did not 
conclude. We need feedback from Thomas Gleixner.

Regards,
Sudeep

[1] 
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-May/254838.html
[2] 
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-June/265191.html

> Signed-off-by: Neil Zhang <zhangwm@marvell.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/kernel/irq.c |    5 ++---
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
> index 2c42576..6f5a878 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -167,11 +167,10 @@ static bool migrate_one_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>   	if (irqd_is_per_cpu(d) || !cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), affinity))
>   		return false;
>
> -	if (cpumask_any_and(affinity, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) {
> -		affinity = cpu_online_mask;
> +	if (cpumask_any_and(affinity, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
>   		ret = true;
> -	}
>
> +	affinity = cpu_online_mask;
>   	c = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
>   	if (!c->irq_set_affinity)
>   		pr_debug("IRQ%u: unable to set affinity\n", d->irq);
>