From: ohaugan@codeaurora.org (Olav Haugan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/1] iommu-api: Add map_sg/unmap_sg functions
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:48:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F266AE.40303@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGtGmAQjMc5W5a6x5QiyUc8v0XHcsNAFe65Znc=DDKPS+w@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/18/2014 11:32 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:07 AM, joro at 8bytes.org <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:56:11AM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote:
>>> On 8/12/2014 3:48 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>>> iirc, one plan for 'flags' was some sort of DONT_FLUSH_TLB flag for
>>>> drivers which wanted to map/unmap N buffers with a single flush at the
>>>> end. There might have been some other usages envisioned.
>>>
>>> Yes, that was the original intent of the flags for now. I am sure we can
>>> find other uses for this in the future.
>>
>> Do you have anything else in mind already besides the DONT_FLUSH_TLB
>> flag?
No, I do not have other uses right now. But could imagine use cases like
"force <insert minimum mapping size here> mapping" flag etc.
>> How is the IOTLB supposed to be flushed when this flag is used?
>>
>
> well, I was thinking one of two ways:
>
> 1) add new flush() vfunc.. this, I think, would be most convenient for
> drivers using this feature
> 2) or driver simply doesn't set DONT_FLUSH_TLB flag on the last
> {map,unmap}.. that would be slightly more awkward to use, but would
> avoid adding a new vfunc
>
I agree and would support adding a public flush() API. It is cleaner.
However, it does allow clients to chose which method to use. Either an
extra call to flush() or just do not pass DONT_FLUSH_TLB flag on the
last invocation of map/unmap.
Thanks,
Olav
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-18 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-11 22:45 [PATCH v5 0/1] Add iommu map_sg/unmap_sg API Olav Haugan
2014-08-11 22:45 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] iommu-api: Add map_sg/unmap_sg functions Olav Haugan
2014-08-12 1:35 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-12 16:53 ` Olav Haugan
2014-08-12 1:51 ` Hiroshi Doyu
2014-08-12 10:48 ` Rob Clark
2014-08-12 16:56 ` Olav Haugan
2014-08-18 14:07 ` joro at 8bytes.org
2014-08-18 18:32 ` Rob Clark
2014-08-18 20:48 ` Olav Haugan [this message]
2014-08-18 21:26 ` joro at 8bytes.org
2014-08-18 21:32 ` Olav Haugan
2014-08-12 16:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-08-12 17:10 ` Olav Haugan
2014-08-18 21:55 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-08-18 22:47 ` Olav Haugan
2014-08-19 11:59 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-08-19 16:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-08-19 18:40 ` Olav Haugan
2014-08-19 20:52 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-08-20 5:21 ` Thierry Reding
2014-08-20 13:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-08-20 14:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-08-19 18:37 ` Olav Haugan
2014-09-25 17:01 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-10-06 19:02 ` Olav Haugan
2014-10-15 9:16 ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-16 17:23 ` Olav Haugan
2014-10-17 9:09 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53F266AE.40303@codeaurora.org \
--to=ohaugan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).