From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:24:40 +0800
Subject: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v2 06/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse MADT to map
 logical cpu to MPIDR and get cpu_possible/present_map
In-Reply-To: <CAMDttNf5d6XZ66mbiZivLmZQvcFv1mN1KKkN6TUQe_Z5VCu-1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1407166105-17675-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>	<1407166105-17675-7-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>	<53F24705.7080809@arm.com>	<53F32E3C.1070102@linaro.org>
 <CAMDttNf5d6XZ66mbiZivLmZQvcFv1mN1KKkN6TUQe_Z5VCu-1g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <53F414F8.2030405@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 2014-8-20 0:46, Zi Shen Lim wrote:
> Hanjun,

Hi Lim,

> 
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Will INTERRUPT_CONTROLLER confuse people? There is only one GIC redistributor
>> (some people regard it as interrupt controller) in ARM system, if we use
>> INTERRUPT_CONTROLLER people will regard it as multi-redistributors in the
>> system, I think GIC_CPU_INTERFACE would be better, what do you think?
> 
> I think you meant to say "one GIC _distributor_" (GICD) instead of
> redistributor (GICR).
> ACPI5.1 only describes one GICD per system, but we can most certainly
> describe multiple GICRs.
> For multi-cpu systems, you'll definitely see multiple GIC redistributors.

Yes, you are right, thanks for pointing it out, I think I need more coffee :)

Thanks
Hanjun