linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lauraa@codeaurora.org (Laura Abbott)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 4/7] arm64: Move some head.text functions to executable section
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:32:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53FBD59B.6080807@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140822094857.GP21734@leverpostej>

On 8/22/2014 2:48 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:42:13PM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> On 8/21/2014 3:34 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> Hi Laura,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 02:20:36AM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>>> The code in the head.text section of the kernel exists in the
>>>> same section as the swapper_pg_dir which means it needs the
>>>> same page table permissions. The swapper_pg_dir needs to be
>>>> writeable but shouldn't be executable.
>>>
>>> I think we can drop the above. As far as I can tell as of commit
>>> bd00cd5f8c8c (arm64: place initial page tables above the kernel) it's no
>>> longer relevant.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, this should be changed. Instead of citing swapper_pg_dir, I need
>> to cite the fact that there may still be memory outside of stext which
>> will get freed to the buddy allocator and therefore should be RW/NX.
> 
> Ok. I must be missing something here; we don't seem to free any of
> .head.text to the buddy allocator at the moment. Are we just trying to
> have the bare minimum remain executable regardless?
> 

It's not head.text per se, but we do 

memblock_reserve(__pa(_text), _end - _text);

to reserve the text area. On the system I was testing on, _text did not
start at PAGE_OFFSET so there was still some not reserved memory
between PAGE_OFFSET and _text which was freed to the buddy allocator.

>>>> The head.text section
>>>> is intended to be run at early bootup before any of the regular
>>>> kernel mappings have been setup so there is no issue at bootup.
>>>> The suspend/resume/hotplug code path requires some of these
>>>> head.S functions to run however which means they need to be
>>>> executable. We can't easily move all of the head.text to
>>>> an executable section, so split it into two parts: that which
>>>> is used only at early head.S bootup and that which is used
>>>> after bootup. There is a small bit of code duplication because
>>>> of some relocation issues related to accessing code more than
>>>> 1MB away.
>>>
>>> From a cursory glance it looks like the only things we need write access
>>> to in .head.text are __cpu_boot_mode and __switch_data. Can't we instead
>>> place those in .data and make .head.text executable?
>>>
>>> We currently find them with adr, which should be easy to replace with
>>> adrp + add to get around relocation issues.
>>>
>>
>> __boot_cpu_mode should be placed in data with a push section and
>> __switch_data is only modified before the permissions are set up.
> 
> Ok, so those are fine then.
> 
>> I took a closer look at the code and the only thing that actually
>> needs to be executable from head.S is __secondary_switched so
>> the following patch should be sufficient to cover it:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
>> index caa9557..5c17599 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
>> @@ -414,12 +414,14 @@ ENTRY(secondary_startup)
>>         b       __enable_mmu
>>  ENDPROC(secondary_startup)
>>  
>> +       .pushsection    .text, "ax"
>>  ENTRY(__secondary_switched)
>>         ldr     x0, [x21]                       // get secondary_data.stack
>>         mov     sp, x0
>>         mov     x29, #0
>>         b       secondary_start_kernel
>>  ENDPROC(__secondary_switched)
>> +       .popsection
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> 
> If we need to cover __secondary_switched, don't we need to cover
> __turn_mmu_on as well, given that will turn the MMU on and branch to
> __secondary_switched?
> 

You should be right but when I was testing this I seemed to get away
without needing it. It's probably just luck and I should move
__turn_mmu_on to text just to be on the safe side as well.

Thanks,
Laura

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-26  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-21  1:20 [PATCHv3 0/7] Better page protections for arm64 Laura Abbott
2014-08-21  1:20 ` [PATCHv3 1/7] arm64: Treat handle_arch_irq as a function pointer Laura Abbott
     [not found]   ` <CAGXu5jLur_gdXs2X5BCmxB6L5HwgyP12jkrufK7bpS0Cxhp_+Q@mail.gmail.com>
2014-08-25 18:23     ` Laura Abbott
2014-08-28 17:02   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-21  1:20 ` [PATCHv3 2/7] arm64: Switch to ldr for loading the stub vectors Laura Abbott
2014-08-21  9:30   ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-21  1:20 ` [PATCHv3 3/7] arm64: Move cpu_resume into the text section Laura Abbott
2014-08-25 20:34   ` Stephen Boyd
2014-08-26  0:43     ` Laura Abbott
2014-08-26  1:08       ` Stephen Boyd
2014-08-21  1:20 ` [PATCHv3 4/7] arm64: Move some head.text functions to executable section Laura Abbott
2014-08-21 10:34   ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-21 21:42     ` Laura Abbott
2014-08-22  9:48       ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-26  0:32         ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2014-08-26 17:45           ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-21  1:20 ` [PATCHv3 5/7] arm64: Factor out fixmap initialiation from ioremap Laura Abbott
2014-08-23  5:45   ` Kees Cook
2014-08-25 18:34     ` Laura Abbott
2014-08-21  1:20 ` [PATCHv3 6/7] arm64: use fixmap for text patching when text is RO Laura Abbott
2014-08-23  5:51   ` Kees Cook
2014-08-25 18:38     ` Laura Abbott
2014-08-26 18:36       ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-21  1:20 ` [PATCHv3 7/7] arm64: add better page protections to arm64 Laura Abbott
2014-08-23  5:59   ` Kees Cook
2014-08-25 19:04     ` Laura Abbott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53FBD59B.6080807@codeaurora.org \
    --to=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).