From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:22:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 03/11] KVM: ARM/arm64: avoid returning negative error code as bool In-Reply-To: <1409062410-25891-4-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> References: <1409062410-25891-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> <1409062410-25891-4-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> Message-ID: <53FC9817.6080106@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 26/08/14 15:13, Will Deacon wrote: > is_valid_cache returns true if the specified cache is valid. > Unfortunately, if the parameter passed it out of range, we return > -ENOENT, which ends up as true leading to potential hilarity. > > This patch returns false on the failure path instead. > > Cc: Christoffer Dall > Cc: Marc Zyngier > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon With a brown paper bag on: Acked-by: Marc Zyngier M. > --- > arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c | 2 +- > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c > index 37a0fe1bb9bb..7928dbdf2102 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/coproc.c > @@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ static bool is_valid_cache(u32 val) > u32 level, ctype; > > if (val >= CSSELR_MAX) > - return -ENOENT; > + return false; > > /* Bottom bit is Instruction or Data bit. Next 3 bits are level. */ > level = (val >> 1); > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > index 5805e7c4a4dd..4cc3b719208e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static bool is_valid_cache(u32 val) > u32 level, ctype; > > if (val >= CSSELR_MAX) > - return -ENOENT; > + return false; > > /* Bottom bit is Instruction or Data bit. Next 3 bits are level. */ > level = (val >> 1); > -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...