From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: behanw@converseincode.com (Behan Webster) Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 16:53:39 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: LLVMLinux: Provide __aeabi_* symbols which are needed for clang In-Reply-To: References: <1409959394-14936-1-git-send-email-behanw@converseincode.com> <2954780.2t9bpyu7ov@wuerfel> <56E276C7-8204-48DD-B5C5-BF5B1452248A@arm.com> Message-ID: <540E2563.8020909@converseincode.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/08/14 16:01, Mark Charlebois wrote: > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Catalin Marinas > wrote: >> On 7 Sep 2014, at 03:30, Mark Charlebois wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>> On Friday 05 September 2014 16:23:14 behanw at converseincode.com wrote: >>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Mark Charlebois >>>>> + */ >>>>> + >>>>> +/* >>>>> + * EABI routines >>>> Does EABI specify these function names? I would think that they are >>>> just random libgcc (whatever that is called in clang) functions. >>> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0043d/IHI0043D_rtabi.pdf >>> >>> See section 4.3.4 Memory copying, clearing, and setting >> What does this document have to do with arm64 (AArch64, A64)? We don?t >> need such symbols on arm64. Also, the arm64 kernel links with libgcc (no >> immediate need AFAICT but the compiler does not guarantee the intrinsics >> would always be generated inline). > [reposting in plain text] > > This patch was made early in the arm64 kernel support. I just retested > and you are correct, it is no longer needed. My apologies to all. Whoops. I normally check whether a patch is still needed before posting them. I seem to have missed that step this time. My apologies as well. That all being said, I prefer to see patches no longer required, than needing them to be upstreamed, so in that this is a win. Behan -- Behan Webster behanw at converseincode.com