From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:09:23 -0700 Subject: [GIT PULL 3.18] ARM: BCM: Broadcom BCM63138 support In-Reply-To: <201409161827.24548.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1409953475-23130-1-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <54167614.7030806@gmail.com> <201409161827.24548.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <54188AE3.60500@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/16/2014 09:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 15 September 2014, Christian Daudt wrote: >>> >>> >>> Arnd has reviewed v2, and v3 addresses his former comments, he has not >>> replied with an Ack though I do not mind waiting for this. >> >> Ok - explicit is better than implicit. Arnd - can you pls confirm your >> ack to these patches ? > > I'm glad you asked, because it triggered me to look at the pull request. > The patches are all good, feel free to add > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > to each patch, or to the merge, whichever works for you. > > However, the pull request was done wrong, so don't merge this changeset > into your branch or we won't pull it from you. > > The problem is that it is based on top of out for-next branch, which is > not meant to be sent upstream to Linus. Instead as you know we expect > all pull requests coming in from platform maintainers to be done as > topic branches and normall based on top of the previous -rc1 release, > or possibly a later -rcX release if you have a strong dependency on > a bug fix that went into that release. > > I'd recommend that Florian rebases from 244a68e90d0775d3e579 to > v3.17-rc1 and send a new pull request, but it's also fine if you > do the rebase and add your Signed-off-by to the patches in the process. I will do this and create a tag for Christian to pull from. Thanks! -- Florian