From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:46:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/5] arm: dts: qcom: Add SPM device bindings for 8974
In-Reply-To: <20140924172345.GE422@ilina-mac>
References: <1411516281-58328-1-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org>
 <1411516281-58328-3-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org>
 <5422621E.2050509@smartplayin.com> <20140924134939.GA422@ilina-mac>
 <5422FD8D.8080307@codeaurora.org> <20140924172345.GE422@ilina-mac>
Message-ID: <54233BAF.5080100@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 09/24/14 10:23, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24 2014 at 11:21 -0600, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 09/24/14 06:49, Lina Iyer wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 24 2014 at 00:14 -0600, Pramod Gurav wrote:
>>>> Hi Lina,
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday 24 September 2014 05:21 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
>>>>> Add SPM device bindings for QCOM 8974 based cpus. SPM is the
>>>>> sub-system
>>>>> power manager and controls the logic around the cores (cpu and L2).
>>>>>
>>>>> Each core has an instance of SPM and controls only that core. Each
>>>>> cpu
>>>>> SPM is configured to support WFI and SPC (standalone-power collapse).
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-pm.dtsi | 69
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi    | 10 +++--
>>>>>  2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974-pm.dtsi
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> +};
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>>>>> index 69dca2a..0580bc2 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>>>>>          #size-cells = <0>;
>>>>>          interrupts = <1 9 0xf04>;
>>>>>
>>>>> -        cpu at 0 {
>>>>> +        CPU0: cpu at 0 {
>>>> Lina, Stephen boyd has sent some DT change for krait-cpufreq which
>>>> also
>>>> renames this node to "cpu0: cpu at 0". If you both could sync up and
>>>> agree
>>>> on a common naming('cpu0' with caps or not caps) for this node.
>>>>
>>> Sure. Will work with Stephen on that.
>>>
>>
>> This doesn't seem like a big deal. I imagine Kumar can resolve the
>> conflict if the two patches merge at the same time.
>>
> I can use the lower case names, if thats common. I see that being used
> for referring to <&acc> in that file, but ofcourse <&L2> exists as well.
> Any preference?
>

No preference. Uppercase at least matches L2 and that matches what's in
the ePAPR so that seems nice.


-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation