linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: addy.ke@rock-chips.com (addy ke)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: adjust the LOW divison based on characteristics of SCL
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:40:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5424C41F.8030508@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=UkAcR8b+T_Dvoy9STDfzyC8QVSawihoHLYyHFJ6bfXxQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi, Doug

On 2014/9/26 5:52, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Addy,
> 
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
>> Addy,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:56 PM, addy ke <addy.ke@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>> In my measurement,all paramter but "Data hold time" are match the characteristics of SCL bus line.
>>> the measured value is 0.928us("data hold time on RK3X"  ~=  "the low period / 2")
>>> but the maximum value described in table is 0.9us
>>>
>>> About "Data hold time", there are described in I2C specification:
>>> - for CBUS compatible masters for I2C-bus deivices
>>> - the maximum data hold time has only be met if the device does not stretch the LOW period of the SCL signal.
>>>
>>> I have tested on RK3288-Pinky board, there are no error.
>>> But I don't known whether this paramter will affect i2c communications.
>>
>> I'll have to spend more time tomorrow to really understand this, but
>> if changing the code to bias towards slightly longer "high" times
>> instead of "low" times helps fix it then that's fine with me.
> 
> So what you're saying is that you're seeing a case where the clock
> goes low and the data is not valid until .928us.  Is this data that is
> being driven by the master or data that is being driven by the slave?
> 
It is driven by the master and will be release at half of LOW period in our IC design.

> Do you know why the data takes so long to be valid?  Maybe you can
> email me some of the waveforms and I can try to help you debug it.
> 
sure, I will email the I2C signal test report table right now.
> 
> In any case it sounds like the the "data hold time" problem is
> unrelated to the clock ratio problem (right?), so maybe you could send
> out patch v2?
> 
Ok, I will send patch v2 today.
thanks.

> -Doug
> 
> P.S. I checked the Rockchip TRM and it claims 400kHz maximum i2c.  I
> think that means you can just remove all of the "fast mode plus" and
> "high speed mode" clock rates from your table.
> 
Ok.
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-26  1:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-24  1:55 [PATCH] i2c: rk3x: adjust the LOW divison based on characteristics of SCL Addy Ke
2014-09-24  4:10 ` Doug Anderson
2014-09-24  8:23   ` addy ke
2014-09-24 17:13     ` Doug Anderson
2014-09-25  1:56       ` addy ke
2014-09-25  4:36         ` Doug Anderson
2014-09-25 21:52           ` Doug Anderson
2014-09-26  1:40             ` addy ke [this message]
2014-09-26  2:08               ` Doug Anderson
2014-09-26  2:40                 ` addy ke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5424C41F.8030508@rock-chips.com \
    --to=addy.ke@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).