From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: wangyijing@huawei.com (Yijing Wang)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 18:12:26 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/22] Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X
 in all platforms
In-Reply-To: <20140929092600.GA15854@bart.dudau.co.uk>
References: <1411614872-4009-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>
 <20140925074235.GN12423@ulmo> <20140925144855.GB31157@bart.dudau.co.uk>
 <20140925164937.GB30382@ulmo> <5424E09F.50701@huawei.com>
 <20140926085030.GE31157@bart.dudau.co.uk> <54276F6C.5010705@huawei.com>
 <20140928112144.GA4671@bart.dudau.co.uk> <5428B971.50101@huawei.com>
 <20140929092600.GA15854@bart.dudau.co.uk>
Message-ID: <5429308A.7030201@huawei.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

>>> Not necessarily. What I have in mind is something like this:
>>
>> This is a good idea, what I'm worried is this series is already large, so I think we need to post
>> another series to do it.
> 
> I wasn't asking to do it here, I was just offering a suggestion (and sharing some experience) when
> it comes to handling msi chip in an arch independent way.

It's a good suggestion, thanks! :)

> 
>>
>>