From: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com (Dietmar Eggemann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 5/6] sched: replace capacity_factor by usage
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:39:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54296109.7020205@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411488485-10025-6-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
On 23/09/14 17:08, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The scheduler tries to compute how many tasks a group of CPUs can handle by
> assuming that a task's load is SCHED_LOAD_SCALE and a CPU capacity is
> SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE but the capacity_factor is hardly working for SMT system,
> it sometimes works for big cores but fails to do the right thing for little
> cores.
>
> Below are two examples to illustrate the problem that this patch solves:
>
> 1 - capacity_factor makes the assumption that max capacity of a CPU is
> SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE and the load of a thread is always is
> SCHED_LOAD_SCALE. It compares the output of these figures with the sum
> of nr_running to decide if a group is overloaded or not.
>
> But if the default capacity of a CPU is less than SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE
> (640 as an example), a group of 3 CPUS will have a max capacity_factor
> of 2 ( div_round_closest(3x640/1024) = 2) which means that it will be
> seen as overloaded if we have only one task per CPU.
>
> 2 - Then, if the default capacity of a CPU is greater than
> SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE (1512 as an example), a group of 4 CPUs will have
> a capacity_factor of 4 (at max and thanks to the fix[0] for SMT system
> that prevent the apparition of ghost CPUs) but if one CPU is fully
> used by a rt task (and its capacity is reduced to nearly nothing), the
> capacity factor of the group will still be 4
> (div_round_closest(3*1512/1024) = 5).
>
> So, this patch tries to solve this issue by removing capacity_factor
> and replacing it with the 2 following metrics :
> -The available CPU's capacity for CFS tasks which is the already used by
> load_balance.
> -The usage of the CPU by the CFS tasks. For the latter, I have
> re-introduced the utilization_avg_contrib which is in the range
> [0..SCHED_CPU_LOAD] whatever the capacity of the CPU is.
IMHO, this last sentence is misleading. The usage of a cpu can be
temporally unbounded (in case a lot of tasks have just been spawned on
this cpu, testcase: hackbench) but it converges very quickly towards a
value between [0..1024]. Your implementation is already handling this
case by capping usage to cpu_rq(cpu)->capacity_orig + 1 .
BTW, couldn't find the definition of SCHED_CPU_LOAD.
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-29 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-23 16:07 [PATCH v6 0/6] sched: consolidation of cpu_capacity Vincent Guittot
2014-09-23 16:08 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] sched: add per rq cpu_capacity_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-09-23 16:08 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity Vincent Guittot
2014-09-23 16:08 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] sched: add utilization_avg_contrib Vincent Guittot
2014-10-03 14:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-03 14:44 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-10-03 14:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-03 14:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-10-03 15:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-03 16:05 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-09-23 16:08 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] sched: get CPU's usage statistic Vincent Guittot
2014-09-25 19:05 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-09-26 12:17 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-09-26 15:58 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-09-26 19:57 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-11-21 5:36 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-21 12:17 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-09-23 16:08 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] sched: replace capacity_factor by usage Vincent Guittot
2014-09-24 17:48 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-09-25 8:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-09-25 19:19 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-09-26 12:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-09-26 14:00 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-09-25 8:38 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-09-29 13:39 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2014-10-02 16:57 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-10-03 7:24 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-10-03 9:35 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-10-03 12:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-23 0:22 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-24 8:26 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-10-03 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-06 8:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-09-23 16:08 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] sched: add SD_PREFER_SIBLING for SMT level Vincent Guittot
2014-09-24 12:27 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-09-25 12:10 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54296109.7020205@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).