linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: vfp: fix VFPv3 hwcap detection on non-ARM vfp implementations
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 10:54:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <542C3FCA.2010006@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <541C74C1.9060504@codeaurora.org>

On 09/19/14 11:24, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 09/18/14 15:46, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:43:11PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/vfp.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/vfp.h
>>> index f4ab34fd4f72..76d3f6907cce 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/vfp.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/vfp.h
>>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>>>  #define FPSID_FORMAT_MASK	(0x3  << FPSID_FORMAT_BIT)
>>>  #define FPSID_NODOUBLE		(1<<20)
>>>  #define FPSID_ARCH_BIT		(16)
>>> -#define FPSID_ARCH_MASK		(0xF  << FPSID_ARCH_BIT)
>>> +#define FPSID_ARCH_MASK		(0x7F  << FPSID_ARCH_BIT)
>> This is incorrect.  On VFPv2, the architecture field is four bits long.
>> As you can see from the above, bit 20 indicates that there are no
>> double operations provided, and the next two bits indicate the FSTMX/
>> FLDMX format.
>>
>> I know that you're changing this to conform with the ARM ARM, but we
>> have to consider that before VFP was subsumed into the ARM ARM, this
>> register had the format described as per this file, and these other
>> bits may be set for an ARM part.  Including these bits in the mask
>> means that we will mis-identify these older parts as VFPv3.
>>
>> Welcome to the lack of standardisation!
>>
> Thank you for the warm welcome! I looked at the TRMs for ARM11 and ARM9.
> I can't find anywhere where VFPv2 is supported and these bits are set.
>
> Bits 22-16 of FPSID:
>
> ARM1136r1p5:     0x01
> ARM1136r1p3:     0x01
> ARM1176:         0x01
> ARM11MPCorer2p0: 0x01
> ARM11MPCorer1p0: 0x01
> ARM1156:         0x01
> ARM9:            0x01
>
>
> Do you, or anyone else, know of other implementations? I *hope* that
> this same exercise was done by the VFP architects before they
> re-purposed bits but who knows. If nobody is actually setting these
> higher bits then is there any problem widening the mask (besides it
> being slightly confusing)?
>

Any thoughts?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-01 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-18 21:43 [PATCH 0/3] Krait VFP fixes Stephen Boyd
2014-09-18 21:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: vfp: Workaround bad MVFR1 register on some Kraits Stephen Boyd
2014-09-18 21:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: vfp: fix VFPv3 hwcap detection on non-ARM vfp implementations Stephen Boyd
2014-09-18 22:46   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-19 18:24     ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-01 17:54       ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2014-10-08 12:49         ` Will Deacon
2014-10-01 21:50       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-01 22:09         ` Stephen Boyd
2014-09-18 21:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm: vfp: Bounce undefined instructions in vectored mode Stephen Boyd
2014-09-18 22:55   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-19  1:40     ` Will Deacon
2014-09-18 22:32 ` [PATCH 0/3] Krait VFP fixes Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-19 16:29   ` Stephen Boyd
2014-09-21 16:40 ` Rob Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=542C3FCA.2010006@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).