From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 06:27:08 -0700
Subject: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 14/16] x86/xen: support poweroff through
 poweroff handler call chain
In-Reply-To: <542D1EC4.10100@citrix.com>
References: <1412100056-15517-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net>
 <1412100056-15517-15-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net>
 <542D1EC4.10100@citrix.com>
Message-ID: <542D52AC.3040009@roeck-us.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 10/02/2014 02:45 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 30/09/14 19:00, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> The kernel core now supports a poweroff handler call chain
>> to remove power from the system. Call it if pm_power_off
>> is set to NULL.
>>
>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> index c0cb11f..645d00f 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> @@ -1322,6 +1322,8 @@ static void xen_machine_power_off(void)
>>   {
>>   	if (pm_power_off)
>>   		pm_power_off();
>> +	else
>> +		do_kernel_poweroff();
>
> Why isn't this if (pm_power_off) check in do_kernel_poweroff()?
>
> That way when you finally remove pm_power_off you need only update one
> place.  A quick skim of the other archs suggest this would work for them
> too.
>

Good idea. I'll do that for the next version of the patch set.

Guenter