From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] Per-user clock constraints
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:32:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5435E5B0.90900@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412695334-2608-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
On 10/07/2014 08:21 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this second version of the series adds several cleanups that were suggested by
> Stephen Boyd and contains several improvements to the seventh patch (clk: Make
> clk API return per-user struct clk instances) that were suggested by him during
> the review of v1.
>
> The first six patches are just cleanups that should be desirable on their own,
> and that should make easier to review the actual per-user clock patch.
>
> The seventh patch actually moves the per-clock data that was stored in struct
> clk to a new struct clk_core and adds references to it from both struct clk and
> struct clk_hw. struct clk is now ready to contain information that is specific
> to a given clk consumer.
>
> The eighth patch adds API for setting floor and ceiling constraints and stores
> that information on the per-user struct clk, which is iterable from struct
> clk_core.
>
>
As said in the patches, can you please indicate which baseline this is
on? Also can you rebase onto clk-next if you send again before that is
merged into 3.18-rc1? There are some changes in the debugfs part that
will conflict. I'll review the more complicated parts in detail soon.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-09 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-07 15:21 [PATCH v2 0/8] Per-user clock constraints Tomeu Vizoso
2014-10-07 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] clk: Change clk_ops->determine_rate to return a clk_hw as the best parent Tomeu Vizoso
2014-10-09 1:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-10-07 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk instances Tomeu Vizoso
2014-10-09 1:32 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2014-10-09 7:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Per-user clock constraints Tomeu Vizoso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5435E5B0.90900@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).