From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grygorii.strashko@ti.com (Grygorii Strashko) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:13:17 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v1 2/4] ARM: keystone: pm: switch to use generic pm domains In-Reply-To: References: <1412001499-19369-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <1412001499-19369-3-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Message-ID: <543BB3CD.7040001@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/12/2014 03:56 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Hi Grygorii, > > On 9/29/14 7:38 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >> This patch switches Keystone 2 PM code to use Generic PM domains >> instead of PM clock domains because of the lack of DT support >> for the last. >> >> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko > > IMO, this approach is much better. > > One minor nit below... > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c >> index ca79dda..3eb5257 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c >> @@ -12,69 +12,110 @@ >> * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation. >> */ >> >> +#include >> #include >> -#include >> #include >> +#include >> #include >> -#include >> #include >> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME >> -static int keystone_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS >> + >> +struct keystone_domain { >> + struct generic_pm_domain base; >> + struct device *dev; >> +}; > > I think the name 'base' for this field leads to confusion later in the > code, since base usually means something else in drivers. How about > 'genpd'? Agree. I'll change it. Thanks for your comments. Regards, -grygorii