From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: guenter@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 06:30:29 -0700 Subject: ARMADA 370 - Distributed Switch Architecture (dsa) - device tree In-Reply-To: <60c451c4cbeb4666fff3b45ffdcb780e@twien.net> References: <20141013182517.GA18105@roeck-us.net> <60c451c4cbeb4666fff3b45ffdcb780e@twien.net> Message-ID: <543D2575.6050209@roeck-us.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/13/2014 11:05 PM, post at twien.net wrote: > Hi Guenter, > I'm doing this for my employer and have currently no plans for submitting this upstream. Not that I think we will not be willing to, but it's still very premature and I have so far not been able to test this. Am basically struggling to get 'dsa' up and working. Hah, yes, that has its own challenges. Took me a while too. I can send you a working platform file if you think it would help, though that would be for x86, not for devicetree use. Also, I could publish a branch with my 6352 driver on top of the 3.14 kernel (which is where it is currently used) if it helps. Guenter > Best, > Tormod > > On 2014-10-13 20:25, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:14:41PM +0200, post at twien.net wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> I have a custom board equipped with an ARMADA 370 SoC (88f6W11) and >>> a Marvell switch chip (88e6352) (I have written a device driver for >>> the latter). >> >> Hi Tormod, >> >> coincidentially, I have a DSA driver for 88e6352 almost ready for submitting it >> upstream. What are your plans for your driver ? Do you plan to submit it >> upstream ? Either case, it would be great if you could share a pointer to it >> so we can make sure that it works for both our use cases. >> >> I have made my patch set available in the 'dsa' branch of >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git >> in case you are interested. >> >> Thanks, >> Guenter >