From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 16:18:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v11 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms In-Reply-To: References: <1413805281-6269-1-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> <5444F38A.1000101@gmail.com> Message-ID: <544519A2.8010604@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 20.10.2014 13:48, Thomas Abraham wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> On 20.10.2014 13:41, Thomas Abraham wrote: >>> Changes since v10: >>> - Rebased on top of v3.18-rc1 >>> >>> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 and Exynos5250 specific cpufreq >>> drivers and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver for these platforms. This >>> series also enables cpufreq support for Exynos5420 using arm_big_little cpufreq >>> driver. >>> >>> This patch series is based and tested on v3.18-rc1 and depends on the patch >>> - "clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider clock instantiation" >>> (http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org/msg34859.html) >>> This patch has been merged in "arm-soc/samsung/dt3" branch of arm-soc tree. >>> >> >> That patch actually went through clock tree, but it doesn't matter, >> because AFAIK all the dependencies for this series are already in >> 3.18-rc1. I'll try to apply it in next days > > Thanks. The patch "clk: exynos4: remove duplicate div_core2 divider > clock instantiation" is not available in 3.18-rc1. So for testing, I > picked this patch from samsung/dt3 branch from arm-soc tree. Hmm? I can see it there: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/drivers/clk/samsung?id=v3.18-rc1 Best regards, Tomasz