From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 18:46:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 02/58] serial: at91: Use dmaengine_slave_config API In-Reply-To: <20141103123311.GJ11263@lukather> References: <1414531573-18807-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1414531573-18807-3-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <5457632C.5020002@atmel.com> <20141103123311.GJ11263@lukather> Message-ID: <5457BF7A.4060105@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/11/2014 13:33, Maxime Ripard : > Hi Nicolas, > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:12:44PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> On 28/10/2014 22:25, Maxime Ripard : >>> We are removing the dmaengine_device_control API, that shouldn't even have been >>> exposed in the first place. Change the callers to use the proper API. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard >> >> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre >> >> Thanks, Maxime. Do I have to carry the patch myself or is it part of a >> series? > > I think it would be better to keep it together with that serie, since > we're removing dmaengine_device_control in a latter patch. If it's ok > for you of course. Fair enough, keep it in. Thanks Maxime, bye, -- Nicolas Ferre