From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 21:50:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v6 4/5] PCI: add PCI controller for keystone PCIe h/w
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqKheoWrSGtxPO=AE8g9iOAqfwRa=81Ku=Cfx8_gpDysOg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1405696469-7172-1-git-send-email-m-karicheri2@ti.com>
 <1405696469-7172-5-git-send-email-m-karicheri2@ti.com>
 <CAL_JsqKheoWrSGtxPO=AE8g9iOAqfwRa=81Ku=Cfx8_gpDysOg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5467203.eMVRoNeSx1@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Friday 18 July 2014 14:31:39 Rob Herring wrote:
> > +
> > + Example:
> > +       pcie_msi_intc: msi-interrupt-controller {
> > +                       interrupt-controller;
> > +                       #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > +                       interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > +                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > +                                       <GIC_SPI 31 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > +                                       <GIC_SPI 32 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > +                                       <GIC_SPI 33 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > +                                       <GIC_SPI 34 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > +                                       <GIC_SPI 35 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > +                                       <GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > +                                       <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > +       };
> > +
> > +pcie_intc: Interrupt controller device node for Legacy irq chip
> > +       interrupt-cells: should be set to 1
> > +       interrupt-parent: Parent interrupt controller phandle
> > +       interrupts: GIC interrupt lines connected to PCI Legacy interrupt lines
> > +
> > + Example:
> > +       pcie_intc: legacy-interrupt-controller {
> > +               interrupt-controller;
> > +               #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > +               interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > +               interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > +                       <GIC_SPI 27 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > +                       <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > +                       <GIC_SPI 29 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > +       };
> 
> This seems wrong. Legacy interrupts should be described with
> interrupt-map and then PCI child devices have a standard interrupt
> specifier.
> 
> I'm not sure about MSIs, but I would think they would have a standard
> format too.
> 

IIRC, it's actually the correct way to do this here: the problem is that
the PCI IRQs are not directly connected to the GIC, but instead there is
a nested irqchip that has each PCI IRQ routed to it and that requires
an extra EOI for each interrupt.

The interrupt-map in the PCI host points to this special irqchip rather
than to the GIC.

	Arnd