From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:02:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v5 01/18] ARM64: Move the init of cpu_logical_map(0) before unflatten_device_tree() In-Reply-To: <20141118165713.GT18842@arm.com> References: <1413553034-20956-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1413553034-20956-2-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <546B4D8D.2020605@linaro.org> <20141118164312.GL28279@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20141118165713.GT18842@arm.com> Message-ID: <546B7B8D.1070201@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Will, I was writing to reply to Catalin's mail :) On 18/11/14 16:57, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 04:43:13PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:45:49PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>> On 2014?10?17? 21:36, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>>> It always make sense to initialize CPU0's logical map entry from the >>>> hardware values, so move the initialization of cpu_logical_map(0) >>>> before unflatten_device_tree() which is needed by ACPI code later. >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Olof Johansson >>>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland >>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo >>> >>> Could you merge this patch first in 3.19? It was acked by Olof and >>> Mark, and it will make sense without ACPI too. >> >> I think it can go in for 3.19 (it's Will's turn this time ;)). > > This patch doesn't apply on for-next/core, as it conflicts with some of > Rutland's rework ("arm64: log physical ID of boot CPU"). > It's actually not required anymore, as "arm64: log physical ID of boot CPU" move it quite early in the sequence from setup_arch to smp_setup_processor_id while this patch just moves it up in setup_arch. Regards, Sudeep