From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maitysanchayan@gmail.com (Sanchayan Maity) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:19:40 +0530 Subject: [[PATCHv2] 3/3] drivers/rtc/rtc-snvs: Add clock support In-Reply-To: <20141119011721.GA24042@dragon> References: <30e496ce2d6521e608df3b68b73b3e05caa1daef.1415364391.git.maitysanchayan@gmail.com> <7807253ec0fd349b5bb1489e0d3b1347@agner.ch> <546320D3.2030501@gmail.com> <20141112104735.GK2704@dragon> <54644295.2050003@gmail.com> <20141119011721.GA24042@dragon> Message-ID: <546C2164.3040708@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 19 November 2014 06:47 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:03:09AM +0530, Sanchayan Maity wrote: >> On Wednesday 12 November 2014 04:17 PM, Shawn Guo wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:26:51PM +0530, Sanchayan Maity wrote: >>>> On Wednesday 12 November 2014 02:57 AM, Stefan Agner wrote: >>>>> On 2014-11-07 14:04, Sanchayan Maity wrote: >>>>>> This patch adds clock enable and disable support for >>>>>> the SNVS peripheral, which is required for using the >>>>>> RTC within the SNVS block. >>>>> >>>>> What happens if the device tree node is there while this patch is not >>>>> applied? I guess the driver would load, but since the clocks of the >>>>> peripheral are not enabled the first register access would lead to bus >>>>> error or similar. If this is the case, this would break bisectability. >>>>> You should move the device tree patch to the end. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If the DT node was present with this patch not applied, the driver would >>>> still crash with a bus error, since the clocks for SNVS are not explicitly >>>> enabled anywhere else. I had not thought about any problems which might >>>> occur later with git bisect. Will move this to the end with v3. >>> >>> Since changes on rtc-snvs.c will need to go through RTC subsystem tree, >>> that means I cannot apply DTS changes until the driver patch gets >>> mainlined and appears on my tree. >>> >>> Shawn >> >> Shawn >> >> So the approach in this patch is OK and acceptable? > > Yes, I'm fine with it. > > Shawn Hello Alessandro, Sorry I missed adding you while sending this patch set. Can you take this third patch, in this series through your RTC subsytem tree? Or should I resend this third patch separately? Regards, Sanchayan. > >> >> Since the DT changes cannot be applied by you, till this goes through the >> RTC subsystem tree, gets mainlined and appears on your tree, I will send out >> this patch by itself then and send the DT changes later once this gets >> mainlined? >> >> I did not CC Alessandro Zummo, the maintainer of RTC subsystem by mistake. >> Once you ACK/OK this i will send out this patch in isolation then or just >> CC Alessandro Zummo.