From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 21:07:11 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/6] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Remove unwanted reg_se_cache
 save
In-Reply-To: <CAJKbBDDVTA+=priRu7sCD=vHrC8AUg4DM3kycuGrqbpF-5FGAA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1415941651-28962-1-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com>	<1415941651-28962-4-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com>	<20141118143005.GF24004@x1>	<20141118171240.GB3003@dtor-ws>	<546DF2F0.9080405@ti.com>	<20141120144028.GB5809@localhost.localdomain>	<546F2BA4.4000808@ti.com>	<20141121131036.GA18931@localhost.localdomain>
 <CAJKbBDDVTA+=priRu7sCD=vHrC8AUg4DM3kycuGrqbpF-5FGAA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <546F5C27.7040004@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Friday 21 November 2014 08:41 PM, Johannes Pointner wrote:
> I tested version 4 of the patch series on a custom design and I saw
> also the jumps as described by Richard. I played a little with the
> sample delay and it got better but I couldn't completely remove the
> jumps.

And before the patches were applied, there were no jumps at all? Which
kernel are you using for testing?

Thanks,
Sekhar