From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kernellwp@gmail.com (Wanpeng Li) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:34:11 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 09/11] sched: test the cpu's capacity in wake affine In-Reply-To: References: <1400860385-14555-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1400860385-14555-10-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20140528105855.GR30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Message-ID: <54727D03.4090909@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Vincent, On 5/28/14, 7:15 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On 28 May 2014 12:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 05:53:03PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: [snip] >> Now I'm only struggling to understand the rationale for this, its got >> LLC in there somewhere, but I'm failing to comprehend. > Ah.. i have probably overestimated the fact that wake_affine was only > done at MC or SMT level but after reading more deeply the glags > configuration of all sched_domain level , my assumption is not true. What's level the wake_affine should happen? Regards, Wanpeng Li > So I need to test sd flag to make sure that their share their cache at > this level > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/