From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric.auger@linaro.org (Eric Auger) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:08:15 +0100 Subject: [RFC 0/4] vgic additions for forwarded irq In-Reply-To: <54730E6C.1040708@arm.com> References: <1416766373-13569-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org> <20141124105037.GL3401@cbox> <54730E6C.1040708@arm.com> Message-ID: <5473119F.5060707@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/24/2014 11:54 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 24/11/14 10:50, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:12:49PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: >>> This series applies on top of "ARM: Forwarding physical >>> interrupts to a guest VM" (http://lwn.net/Articles/603514/) >>> series. >> >> Marc and Eric, >> >> Does it make sense to review and look at these patches given the current >> state of the forwarding patches, or should we wait until Marc respins >> that series? > > I'm still in the process of respining all of this (we've had a few > iterations with tglx, but I got sidetracked with the ITS/v2m/MSI side of > things). Hi Marc, Christoffer, for your info, I integrated with kvm-arm64/irq-forward branch prior to ITS integration, not with the RFC. Best Regards Eric > > I'll get back onto this this week. Hopefully. > > Thanks, > > M. >