From: tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org (Tomasz Nowicki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 03/18] ACPI / table: Count matched and successfully parsed entries without specifying max entries
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 16:18:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54734C37.1060208@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1943415.qgIc2QypIM@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 24.11.2014 16:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, November 24, 2014 04:01:24 PM Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>> On 24.11.2014 16:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Monday, November 24, 2014 09:34:24 AM Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>>>> On 24.11.2014 02:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, October 17, 2014 09:36:59 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>>>> From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is very useful to traverse all available table entries without max
>>>>>> number of expected entries type. Current acpi_parse_entries()
>>>>>> implementation gives that feature but it does not count those entries,
>>>>>> it returns 0 instead, so fix it to count matched and successfully
>>>>>> entries and return it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm. I guess that the goal is for count to only be incremented when the
>>>>> condition is satisfied entirely, while without the patch it may be incremented
>>>>> even if that isn't the case.
>>>>
>>>> That would be our goal if patch would look like:
>>>> - && (!max_entries || count++ < max_entries))
>>>> + && (!max_entries && count++ < max_entries)) {
>>>> but then we can not walk through all available entries (with max_entries==0)
>>>
>>> No, that's not what I was trying to say. :-)
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure how that is related to the above paragraph, however.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Previous changelog is not clear, let me rewrite it:
>>>>
>>>> acpi_parse_entries() allows to traverse all available table entries (aka
>>>> subtables) by passing max_entries parameter equal to 0. But for that use
>>>> case acpi_parse_entries() does not inform caller how many entries were
>>>> matched and for how many entries handler was run against. That patch is
>>>> going to fix it.
>>>
>>> Do I understand correctly that count is only ever incremented by current code
>>> if max_entries is different from 0?
>>
>> Right. Currently "count" is incremented only if max_entries > 0.
>
> So can you say that in the changelog, please?
>
> Something like:
>
> "acpi_parse_entries() allows to traverse all available table entries (aka
> subtables) by passing max_entries parameter equal to 0, but since its count
> variable is only incremented if max_entries is not 0, the function always
> returns 0 for max_entries equal to 0. It would be more useful if it returned
> the number of entries matched instead, so make it increment count in that
> case too".
>
Sure, thanks.
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-24 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-17 13:36 [PATCH v5 00/18] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:36 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] ARM64: Move the init of cpu_logical_map(0) before unflatten_device_tree() Hanjun Guo
2014-11-18 13:45 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-11-18 16:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-11-18 16:57 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-18 17:02 ` Sudeep Holla
2014-11-18 17:03 ` Will Deacon
2014-11-19 0:29 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:36 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] ACPI / table: Add new function to get table entries Hanjun Guo
2014-11-24 1:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-24 11:03 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-11-24 14:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-25 3:38 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-11-25 21:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-26 1:42 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:36 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] ACPI / table: Count matched and successfully parsed entries without specifying max entries Hanjun Guo
2014-11-18 13:51 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-11-18 20:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-19 0:34 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-11-24 1:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-24 8:34 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-11-24 15:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-24 15:01 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2014-11-24 15:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-11-24 15:18 ` Tomasz Nowicki [this message]
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Get RSDP and ACPI boot-time tables Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce sleep-arm.c Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param for "acpi" and pass acpi=force to enable ACPI Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] ARM64 / ACPI: If we chose to boot from acpi then disable FDT Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse FADT table to get PSCI flags for PSCI init Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] ACPI / table: Print GIC information when MADT is parsed Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse MADT for SMP initialization Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] ACPI / processor: Make it possible to get CPU hardware ID via GICC Hanjun Guo
2014-10-24 17:39 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-27 9:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-10-29 10:43 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-30 8:27 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-10-29 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-30 8:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC and register device's gsi Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse GTDT to initialize arch timer Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI is enabled on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Enable ARM64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2014-10-17 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2014-12-18 20:01 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-12-19 13:04 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-12-18 20:04 ` Timur Tabi
2014-12-19 13:53 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-12-24 17:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-24 19:33 ` Jon Masters
2014-12-26 13:23 ` Mark Brown
2014-12-30 11:23 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-01-05 13:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-05 20:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-06 11:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-06 13:51 ` G Gregory
2015-01-06 14:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-06 13:59 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-06 14:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-06 19:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-15 14:10 ` Grant Likely
2015-01-15 15:51 ` Jon Masters
2015-01-15 16:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-15 17:22 ` Al Stone
2015-01-16 16:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-15 18:00 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-06 16:24 ` Jon Masters
2015-01-06 19:21 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-06 22:06 ` Jon Masters
2015-01-07 4:55 ` Jon Masters
2015-01-07 10:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-07 11:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-07 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-07 17:27 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-07 17:44 ` Jon Masters
2015-01-07 19:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-07 20:05 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-07 20:14 ` Jon Masters
2015-01-09 10:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-09 10:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-09 15:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-07 18:41 ` Jason Cooper
2015-01-07 19:58 ` Jon Masters
2015-01-07 20:05 ` Jon Masters
2015-01-07 22:59 ` Jason Cooper
2015-01-08 11:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-08 19:59 ` Kangkang Shen
2015-01-07 21:40 ` Jason Cooper
2015-01-07 22:10 ` Jon Masters
2015-01-04 9:39 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-01-05 11:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-06 11:11 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-01-06 11:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-06 13:50 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-01-06 13:54 ` G Gregory
2015-01-06 13:59 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-01-06 14:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-06 14:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-06 14:37 ` Charles Garcia-Tobin
2015-01-06 16:37 ` Jon Masters
2015-01-09 23:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <CAJ5Y-eZ5cu9_OhG24yAv+CZq7zKg0vU+eVGekyN+9dDzaz1OhQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-12-30 20:13 ` ashwinc at codeaurora.org
2014-12-31 8:34 ` Hanjun Guo
2014-12-31 15:08 ` ashwinc at codeaurora.org
2015-01-01 20:04 ` Graeme Gregory
2015-01-02 9:28 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-01-02 16:47 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54734C37.1060208@linaro.org \
--to=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).