[PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: Add Juno board device tree.

[marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)]

On 26/11/14 10:59, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:30:24AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Liviu,
>>
>> On 11/11/14 17:32, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>>> This adds support for ARM's Juno development board (rev 0).
>>> It enables most of the board peripherals: UART, I2C, USB, MMC and
>>> 100Mb ethernet. There is no support at the moment for clock setting
>>> and HDLCD driver which depends on it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/Makefile              |   1 +
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-clocks.dtsi      |  45 ++++++
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-motherboard.dtsi | 129 +++++++++++++++
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts              | 218 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  4 files changed, 393 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-clocks.dtsi
>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-motherboard.dtsi
>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts
>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..097ecc4
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +       timer {
>>> +               compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
>>> +               interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>,
>>> +                            <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>,
>>> +                            <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>,
>>> +                            <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(6) | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)>;
>>> +       };
>>
>> Sorry, I should have spotted this earlier: all these interrupts are
>> *level*, not edge. This happens to work because the GIC's config
>> register is RO for PPIs on Juno, but still...
> 
> Yes, I've seen your other email to Suravee regarding interrupt triggering and I was trying to
> find the relevant bits in Juno to tell me why I've put the info in DT this way. Maybe I *did*
> copy-paste this part from FVP DT though.
> 
> I will send a patch to Olof to update.

Yeah, looks like most (if not all) DTs in the tree are broken. Any
chance you could write a sweeping patch to fix them all (at least for
the ARM implementations)?

The APM and Cavium implementations also carry the same values, and I
suppose this is a bug too, but someone with access to documentation
should figure this out.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...