From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:48:24 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v10 02/10] qcom: scm: Add SCM warmboot support for quad core SoCs In-Reply-To: <1416593037-27527-3-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> References: <1416593037-27527-1-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> <1416593037-27527-3-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org> Message-ID: <54762E88.50300@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/21/2014 10:03 AM, Lina Iyer wrote: > @@ -37,3 +54,17 @@ int scm_set_boot_addr(phys_addr_t addr, int flags) > &cmd, sizeof(cmd), NULL, 0); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(scm_set_boot_addr); > + > +int scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void *entry, int cpu) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + if (entry == scm_flags[cpu].entry) > + return 0; Is the entry going to be different at some point? I wonder why we can't just call this function once when the SPM device probes to setup the entry point to cpu_resume()? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project