From: vladimir.murzin@arm.com (Vladimir Murzin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: imx6: fix bogus use of irq_get_irq_data
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 17:57:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <547CAC27.2090200@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417453443-9179-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Hi Marc,
On 01/12/14 17:04, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The imx6 PM code seems to be quite creative in its use of irq_data,
> using something something that is very much a hardware interrupt
^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^
More "something" here! ;)
Vladimir
> number where we expect a virtual one. Yes, it worked so far, but
> that's only cheer luck, and it will definitely explode in 3.19.
>
> Fix it by using a pair of helper functions that deal with the
> actual hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h | 4 ++--
> arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx6.c | 5 ++---
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h
> index 1dabf43..66662a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h
> @@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ void imx_gpc_pre_suspend(bool arm_power_off);
> void imx_gpc_post_resume(void);
> void imx_gpc_mask_all(void);
> void imx_gpc_restore_all(void);
> -void imx_gpc_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d);
> -void imx_gpc_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d);
> +void imx_gpc_hwirq_mask(unsigned int hwirq);
> +void imx_gpc_hwirq_unmask(unsigned int hwirq);
> void imx_anatop_init(void);
> void imx_anatop_pre_suspend(void);
> void imx_anatop_post_resume(void);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> index 1455829..5f3602e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> @@ -91,34 +91,44 @@ void imx_gpc_restore_all(void)
> writel_relaxed(gpc_saved_imrs[i], reg_imr1 + i * 4);
> }
>
> -void imx_gpc_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +void imx_gpc_hwirq_unmask(unsigned int hwirq)
> {
> void __iomem *reg;
> u32 val;
>
> - /* Sanity check for SPI irq */
> - if (d->hwirq < 32)
> - return;
> -
> - reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (d->hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4;
> + reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4;
> val = readl_relaxed(reg);
> - val &= ~(1 << d->hwirq % 32);
> + val &= ~(1 << hwirq % 32);
> writel_relaxed(val, reg);
> }
>
> -void imx_gpc_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +void imx_gpc_hwirq_mask(unsigned int hwirq)
> {
> void __iomem *reg;
> u32 val;
>
> + reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4;
> + val = readl_relaxed(reg);
> + val |= 1 << (hwirq % 32);
> + writel_relaxed(val, reg);
> +}
> +
> +static void imx_gpc_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + /* Sanity check for SPI irq */
> + if (d->hwirq < 32)
> + return;
> +
> + imx_gpc_hwirq_unmask(d->hwirq);
> +}
> +
> +static void imx_gpc_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> /* Sanity check for SPI irq */
> if (d->hwirq < 32)
> return;
>
> - reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (d->hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4;
> - val = readl_relaxed(reg);
> - val |= 1 << (d->hwirq % 32);
> - writel_relaxed(val, reg);
> + imx_gpc_hwirq_mask(d->hwirq);
> }
>
> void __init imx_gpc_init(void)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx6.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx6.c
> index 5c3af8f..d815d1b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx6.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx6.c
> @@ -261,7 +261,6 @@ static void imx6q_enable_wb(bool enable)
>
> int imx6q_set_lpm(enum mxc_cpu_pwr_mode mode)
> {
> - struct irq_data *iomuxc_irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(32);
> u32 val = readl_relaxed(ccm_base + CLPCR);
>
> val &= ~BM_CLPCR_LPM;
> @@ -316,9 +315,9 @@ int imx6q_set_lpm(enum mxc_cpu_pwr_mode mode)
> * 3) Software should mask IRQ #32 right after CCM Low-Power mode
> * is set (set bits 0-1 of CCM_CLPCR).
> */
> - imx_gpc_irq_unmask(iomuxc_irq_data);
> + imx_gpc_hwirq_unmask(32);
> writel_relaxed(val, ccm_base + CLPCR);
> - imx_gpc_irq_mask(iomuxc_irq_data);
> + imx_gpc_hwirq_mask(32);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-01 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-01 17:04 [PATCH] ARM: imx6: fix bogus use of irq_get_irq_data Marc Zyngier
2014-12-01 17:13 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-12-01 17:15 ` Philipp Zabel
2014-12-01 17:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-01 17:57 ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
2014-12-01 18:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 14:48 ` Shawn Guo
2014-12-02 14:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 15:15 ` Shawn Guo
2014-12-02 15:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-02 15:30 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=547CAC27.2090200@arm.com \
--to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).