From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wangzhou.bry@gmail.com (Zhou Wang) Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:43:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: hip04: set ARCH_NR_GPIO to 128 In-Reply-To: References: <1417156188-500-1-git-send-email-wangzhou.bry@gmail.com> <1417156188-500-2-git-send-email-wangzhou.bry@gmail.com> <3094004.3WUKgY6xNz@wuerfel> <547971BF.1050706@gmail.com> Message-ID: <547D5FA7.3040307@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2014?12?01? 22:04, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Zhou Wang wrote: >> On 2014?11?28? 17:33, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Friday 28 November 2014 14:29:47 Zhou Wang wrote: > >>>> default 264 if MACH_H4700 >>>> + default 128 if ARCH_HIP04 >>>> default 0 >>>> help >>>> Maximum number of GPIOs in the system. >>>> >>> >>> If I remember correctly, you don't actually need to set this if all gpio >>> clients are using the new gpio descriptor interfaces instead of gpio >>> numbers. Would that work for you? You'd have to know which devices >> >> If I don't set this, it will use the default ARCH_NR_GPIO(512), then >> the range of GPIO number will be 384~511 which is very strange to users, >> because Hip04 based machines can only support 128 GPIOs. > > That is a totally different problem. > > Not that these numbers have ever been stable... > > Think of a patch to gpiochip_find_base() in > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c to fix this so that numbers are > assigned a better way rather than doing > random hacks with numbers like this. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij > Hi Linus, how about a patch like this, we read the base from the dts here. diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index e8e98ca..0c40f53 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -107,11 +107,16 @@ struct gpio_chip *gpiod_to_chip(const struct gpio_desc *desc) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_to_chip); /* dynamic allocation of GPIOs, e.g. on a hotplugged device */ -static int gpiochip_find_base(int ngpio) +static int gpiochip_find_base(struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip) { struct gpio_chip *chip; + int ngpio = gpio_chip->ngpio; int base = ARCH_NR_GPIOS - ngpio; + /* just prototype */ + if (!of_property_read_u32(gpio_chip->dev->of_node, "base", &base)) + return base; + list_for_each_entry_reverse(chip, &gpio_chips, list) { /* found a free space? */ if (chip->base + chip->ngpio <= base) @@ -236,7 +241,7 @@ int gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip) spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); if (base < 0) { - base = gpiochip_find_base(chip->ngpio); + base = gpiochip_find_base(chip); if (base < 0) { status = base; goto unlock; Best regards, Zhou Wang