From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 15:22:19 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: imx6: fix bogus use of irq_get_irq_data
In-Reply-To: <20141202151505.GP2411@dragon>
References: <1417453443-9179-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
 <20141202144759.GO2411@dragon> <547DD254.4090704@arm.com>
 <20141202151505.GP2411@dragon>
Message-ID: <547DD92B.8090104@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 02/12/14 15:15, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 02:53:08PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Shawn,
>>
>> On 02/12/14 14:48, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 05:04:03PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>> The imx6 PM code seems to be quite creative in its use of irq_data,
>>>> using something something that is very much a hardware interrupt
>>>> number where we expect a virtual one.  Yes, it worked so far, but
>>>> that's only cheer luck, and it will definitely explode in 3.19.
>>>>
>>>> Fix it by using a pair of helper functions that deal with the
>>>> actual hardware.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Arnd, Olof,
>>>
>>> To avoid a non-booting 3.19-rc1 on i.MX6, please apply it for 3.19-rc1.
>>
>> The previous patch (ARM: imx: irq: fix buggy usage of irq_data irq
>> field) should also be applied (you cannot apply one without the other
>> anyway).
> 
> Marc,
> 
> Thanks a lot for the fixes.  To ease arm-soc folks' work, you should
> probably resend the patches with squashing them into one or having them
> in a series.

Sure. Can I put your Acked-by on both patches?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...