From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:10:41 +0100
Subject: ARM: DaVinci: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function
 call "__clk_disable"
In-Reply-To: <547EC6B8.6000001@users.sourceforge.net>
References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402212321410.2043@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402231635510.1985@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402240658210.2090@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402241710370.2074@hadrien>
 <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402251014170.2080@hadrien>
 <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1402251840450.7035@hadrien>
 <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402252117150.2047@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402262129250.2221@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <547EC6B8.6000001@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <547ED391.1050507@users.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

> The __clk_disable() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.

I was a bit too quick to send you this notification. I stumbled once more
on the detail that my source code analysis approach is incomplete for
static functions so far.

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm/mach-davinci/clock.c?id=a7ca2bcf2d2ef15c343a12f2a4c2e06380a0f495#n47
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/drivers/clk/clk.c?id=4dc7ed32f398fa76b9e1d243a852420b1dad0150#n846

I would like to apologise for confusion I introduced here.

Regards,
Markus