linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew.Jackson@arm.com (Andrew Jackson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] ASoC: dwc: Add devicetree support for Designware I2S
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:42:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54802C75.9060609@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141203182351.GF7712@sirena.org.uk>

On 12/03/14 18:23, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 04:39:08PM +0000, Andrew Jackson wrote:
> 
>> Convert to driver to use either platform_data or device-tree for configuration
>> of the device.  When using device-tree, the I2S block's configuration is read
>> from the relevant registers: this reduces the amount of information required in
>> the device tree.
> 
> This really needs to be split into two or more patches, there's a whole
> bunch of refactoring to support this DT stuff which should be separate
> from the DT addition itself.  Right now it's hard to tell what each
> individual bit of the code is supposed to be doing, the patch is far too
> large and doing far too many individual things.

I will have look at how it might be split.  The majority of the new code is in reading and processing the device's configuration: I didn't want to change the platform data handling to do that because some of the comments in the driver suggested that there were ST specific changes to the Designware IP.  I wasn't in a position to know whether, if I changed the configuration reading, the driver would still function correctly on the SPEAR platform.

>> +	if (dev->using_pd) {
>> +		ret = dev->i2s_clk_cfg(config);
>> +		if (ret < 0) {
>> +			dev_err(dev->dev, "runtime audio clk config fail\n");
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
>> +		u32	bitclk;
> 
> Having this whole separate path for using platform data feels icky, we
> don't want to have completely separate flows like this.  Checking for
> the callbacks being there is probably fine but just having totally
> separate code paths is a bit icky.

I wasn't very happy either but making the test explicit seemed reasonable at the time.  I'll change the code to test for the presence of the callback instead.

	Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-04  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-03 16:39 [PATCH 4/5] ASoC: dwc: Add devicetree support for Designware I2S Andrew Jackson
2014-12-03 18:23 ` Mark Brown
2014-12-04  9:42   ` Andrew Jackson [this message]
2014-12-03 20:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-03 20:19   ` Mark Brown
2014-12-04  9:55     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-04 11:07       ` Mark Brown
2014-12-04 11:17         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-04 11:33           ` Mark Brown
2014-12-04  9:43   ` Andrew Jackson
2014-12-04  7:02 ` rajeev kumar
2014-12-04  7:43 ` rajeev kumar
2014-12-04 10:00   ` Andrew Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54802C75.9060609@arm.com \
    --to=andrew.jackson@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).