[PATCH v7 08/11] arm/arm64: Unexport restart handlers

[linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)]

On 12/04/2014 06:44 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi G?nther,
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>> On 12/04/2014 05:36 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>>> Implementing a restart handler in a module don't make sense
>>>> as there would be no guarantee that the module is loaded when
>>>> a restart is needed. Unexport arm_pm_restart to ensure that
>>>> no one gets the idea to do it anyway.
>>>
>>> Why not? I was just going to do that, but I got greeted by:
>>
>> Because you should register a restart handler instead, like the other
>> drivers in the same directory now do.
>
> That's a different thing. "there would be no guarantee that the module is
> loaded when a restart is needed" is also valid for restart handlers...
>

Not really, because you are supposed to unregister the restart handler
on unload. Sure, you can instead clear arm_pm_reastart and leave the system
with no means to restart ...

Guenter

>>> ERROR: "arm_pm_restart" [drivers/power/reset/rmobile-reset.ko] undefined!
>>>
>>> So now we have to make sure all reset drivers for a zillion different
>>> hardware devices are builtin, and can't be modular?
>>>
>> No. All those drivers need to do is to register a restart handler using
>> the API provided in the patch series.
>>
>> Ultimately all restart handlers should do that and arm_pm_restart should
>> go away entirely. That was the point of the patch series.
>
> Good. That's what I'm doing right know ;-)
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                          Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                  -- Linus Torvalds
>