From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 11:46:42 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] arm/arm64: KVM: Don't clear the VCPU_POWER_OFF flag
In-Reply-To: <1417641522-29056-2-git-send-email-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
References: <1417641522-29056-1-git-send-email-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
 <1417641522-29056-2-git-send-email-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <54858FA2.2070602@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 03/12/14 21:18, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> If a VCPU was originally started with power off (typically to be brought
> up by PSCI in SMP configurations), there is no need to clear the
> POWER_OFF flag in the kernel, as this flag is only tested during the
> init ioctl itself.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index 9e193c8..b160bea 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	/*
>  	 * Handle the "start in power-off" case by marking the VCPU as paused.
>  	 */
> -	if (__test_and_clear_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF, vcpu->arch.features))
> +	if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF, vcpu->arch.features))
>  		vcpu->arch.pause = true;
>  
>  	return 0;
> 

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...