* [PATCH] ARM: bcm: fix __iomem annotation on kona_smc
@ 2014-12-08 21:45 Olof Johansson
2014-12-08 22:22 ` Florian Fainelli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Olof Johansson @ 2014-12-08 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Fixes the following sparse warning:
arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:145:21: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:145:21: expected unsigned int [usertype] *args
arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:145:21: got void [noderef] <asn:2>*static [toplevel] [assigned] bcm_smc_buffer
arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:151:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:151:9: expected void volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*addr
arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:151:9: got unsigned int [usertype] *
[+ 2 more instances]
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
---
Florian, should we just apply this directly on arm-soc?
-Olof
arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c
index a55a7ec..d506d17 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int bcm_kona_do_smc(u32 service_id, u32 buffer_phys)
static void __bcm_kona_smc(void *info)
{
struct bcm_kona_smc_data *data = info;
- u32 *args = bcm_smc_buffer;
+ u32 __iomem *args = bcm_smc_buffer;
BUG_ON(smp_processor_id() != 0);
BUG_ON(!args);
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM: bcm: fix __iomem annotation on kona_smc
2014-12-08 21:45 [PATCH] ARM: bcm: fix __iomem annotation on kona_smc Olof Johansson
@ 2014-12-08 22:22 ` Florian Fainelli
2014-12-09 8:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2014-12-08 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 08/12/14 13:45, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Fixes the following sparse warning:
> arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:145:21: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:145:21: expected unsigned int [usertype] *args
> arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:145:21: got void [noderef] <asn:2>*static [toplevel] [assigned] bcm_smc_buffer
> arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:151:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
> arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:151:9: expected void volatile [noderef] <asn:2>*addr
> arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:151:9: got unsigned int [usertype] *
> [+ 2 more instances]
>
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
> ---
>
> Florian, should we just apply this directly on arm-soc?
Yes please.
>
>
> -Olof
>
> arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c
> index a55a7ec..d506d17 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int bcm_kona_do_smc(u32 service_id, u32 buffer_phys)
> static void __bcm_kona_smc(void *info)
> {
> struct bcm_kona_smc_data *data = info;
> - u32 *args = bcm_smc_buffer;
> + u32 __iomem *args = bcm_smc_buffer;
Your fix looks good to me, although the original code sounds a little
dubious, especially in LPAE environment.
>
> BUG_ON(smp_processor_id() != 0);
> BUG_ON(!args);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM: bcm: fix __iomem annotation on kona_smc
2014-12-08 22:22 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2014-12-09 8:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2014-12-09 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Monday 08 December 2014 14:22:16 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c
> > index a55a7ec..d506d17 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c
> > @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int bcm_kona_do_smc(u32 service_id, u32 buffer_phys)
> > static void __bcm_kona_smc(void *info)
> > {
> > struct bcm_kona_smc_data *data = info;
> > - u32 *args = bcm_smc_buffer;
> > + u32 __iomem *args = bcm_smc_buffer;
>
> Your fix looks good to me, although the original code sounds a little
> dubious, especially in LPAE environment.
Right, I think it could just use of_iomap() and drop the size
check. If you want to keep the check, using of_address_to_resource()
will do the right thing.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-09 8:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-08 21:45 [PATCH] ARM: bcm: fix __iomem annotation on kona_smc Olof Johansson
2014-12-08 22:22 ` Florian Fainelli
2014-12-09 8:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).