From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] irqchip: kill the GIC routable domain
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:53:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5486C6A6.8060702@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141208224116.GA2538@kahuna>
On 08/12/14 22:41, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Anyways.. The following diff[1] on top of your branch makes DRA7 work - I
> assume you will squash as needed and repost with linux-omap mailing list
> in CC.
Brilliant. I'll squash that into my tree and repost at some point.
> I increased the scope of testing knowing that WUGEN is present in many
> A9 based TI platforms as well.. and at least OMAP4 showed flakiness in
> my testing.. Also a few notes:
>
> Stuff like: am437x is a bit questionable (interrupt-parent probably should be wugen?)
> 175: 0 GIC 39 tps65218
>
> OMAP5: (should be wugen?)
> 308: 4323 0 GIC 106 OMAP UART2
> 411: 0 0 GIC 151 twl6040
> 405: 1 0 GIC 39 palmas
Well, I can't really tell. Someone with access to the documentation
should be able to find out.
> OMAP4 serial port is flaky -> not sure if it is due to routing of GIC to UART2 and not via WUGEN
> IRQ branch: with my fix applied:
> ---------------------------------
[...]
> 18: pandaboard-es: Boot FAIL: http://slexy.org/raw/s20ty0Z6i5 (not expected)
> 19: pandaboard-vanilla: Boot FAIL: http://slexy.org/raw/s20BYfaMd2 (not expected)
If I read the log correctly, the serial port stops responding after a while?
[...]
> I suggest skipping 3.19 if possible and giving it a more detailed time
> in linux-next with omap4 etc being more thoroughly being tested before
> letting it through, if possible.
None of that code is for 3.19 (that ship has sailed a long time ago). My
plan is to hit 3.20, so it should be in -next by -rc4 or so.
> [1] ------------- diff ------------
> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-evm.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-evm.dts
> index c6ce625..d024429 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-evm.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7-evm.dts
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@
> status = "okay";
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_pins>;
> - interrupts-extended = <&gic GIC_SPI 67 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + interrupts-extended = <&crossbar_mpu GIC_SPI 67 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <&dra7_pmx_core 0x3e0>;
> };
Ah, I obviously missed quite a few of these...
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c
> index b44915a..f7daff0 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-crossbar.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static int allocate_gic_irq(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned virq,
> if (err)
> cb->irq_map[i] = IRQ_FREE;
> else
> - cb->write(hwirq, i);
> + cb->write(i, hwirq);
>
> return err;
> }
> @@ -353,4 +353,4 @@ static int __init irqcrossbar_init(struct device_node *node,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ti_irqcrossbar, "ti,irqcrossbar", irqcrossbar_init);
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ti_irqcrossbar, "ti,irq-crossbar", irqcrossbar_init);
Ah, nice catch. Thanks a lot for the testing and the fixes. I'll try to
get a panda up and running (I'm sure I have one collecting dust
somewhere), and see if I can get it to behave.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-09 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-06 13:46 [PATCH 0/5] irqchip: kill the GIC routable domain Marc Zyngier
2014-12-06 13:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] genirq: Add irqchip_set_wake_parent Marc Zyngier
2014-12-06 15:34 ` Stefan Agner
2014-12-08 11:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-06 13:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] irqchip: crossbar: convert dra7 crossbar to stacked domains Marc Zyngier
2014-12-06 13:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] DT: update ti,irq-crossbar binding Marc Zyngier
2014-12-06 13:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] irqchip: GIC: get rid of routable domain Marc Zyngier
2014-12-06 13:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] DT: arm,gic: kill arm,routable-irqs Marc Zyngier
2014-12-07 17:16 ` [PATCH 0/5] irqchip: kill the GIC routable domain Nishanth Menon
2014-12-07 18:03 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-12-08 9:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-08 22:41 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-12-09 9:53 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2014-12-09 18:17 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-12-09 18:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-12-10 18:21 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-01-07 16:14 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-01-07 16:09 ` Jason Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5486C6A6.8060702@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).