From: lyz@rock-chips.com (Yunzhi Li)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] phy: add a driver for the Rockchip SoC internal USB2.0 PHY
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:40:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54882324.10700@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABgxDoJRA4cQBqNBTCSGnnLpcOHqqTuBqcyWQosVv4A_Gx315g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Romain:
On 2014/12/9 18:41, Romain Perier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2014-12-09 3:43 GMT+01:00 Yunzhi Li <lyz@rock-chips.com>:
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Use BIT macro instead of bit shift ops.
>> - Rename the config entry to PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB.
> Contradiction between this , [1] and [2]
>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 7 ++
>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-usb.c | 211 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 219 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-usb.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> index ccad880..8a39d2a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> @@ -239,6 +239,13 @@ config PHY_QCOM_IPQ806X_SATA
>> depends on OF
>> select GENERIC_PHY
>>
>> +config PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB2
>> + tristate "Rockchip USB2 PHY Driver"
>> + depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP && OF
>> + select GENERIC_PHY
>> + help
>> + Enable this to support the Rockchip USB 2.0 PHY.
>> +
> 1. The config entry ends by "USB2". Explain that your driver is for
> usb 2.0 in the description is enough, imho.
>
>> config PHY_ST_SPEAR1310_MIPHY
>> tristate "ST SPEAR1310-MIPHY driver"
>> select GENERIC_PHY
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> index aa74f96..8a13f72 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5250_USB2) += phy-exynos5250-usb2.o
>> phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_S5PV210_USB2) += phy-s5pv210-usb2.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD) += phy-exynos5-usbdrd.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_APQ8064_SATA) += phy-qcom-apq8064-sata.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB2) += phy-rockchip-usb.o
> 2. and... this :)
So,do you mean that I should rename the C source file as
phy-rockchip-usb2.c ?
> Romain
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-09 2:43 [PATCH v4 0/5] Patches to add support for Rockchip usb PHYs Yunzhi Li
2014-12-09 2:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] phy: add a driver for the Rockchip SoC internal USB2.0 PHY Yunzhi Li
2014-12-09 10:41 ` Romain Perier
2014-12-10 10:40 ` Yunzhi Li [this message]
2014-12-10 18:22 ` Romain Perier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54882324.10700@rock-chips.com \
--to=lyz@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).