From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:16:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] sun9i: clk: Fix compile error caused by "clk: sunxi:
 Give sunxi_factors_register a registers parameter"
In-Reply-To: <1418397270-9254-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com>
References: <1418397270-9254-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <548B06CC.70101@redhat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi,

On 12-12-14 16:14, Hans de Goede wrote:
> My "clk: sunxi: Give sunxi_factors_register a registers parameter" patch did
> not adjust the sunxi_factors_clock register calls in the new clk-sun9i-core.c
> clock code, causing compilation errors. This fixes this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Sorry, this one is no good, self-nak.

Note to self, the proper order is: test, then git send-email not the other way around.

Regards,

Hans



> ---
>   drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-core.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-core.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-core.c
> index 3cb9036..3b4495c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun9i-core.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,21 @@
>
>   #include "clk-factors.h"
>
> +static clk *sun9i_factors_register(struct device_node *node,
> +				   const struct factors_data *data,
> +				   spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	void __iomem *reg;
> +
> +	reg = of_iomap(node, 0);
> +	if (!reg) {
> +		pr_err("Could not get registers for factors-clk: %s\n",
> +		       node->name);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	sunxi_factors_register(node, data, lock, reg);
> +}
>
>   /**
>    * sun9i_a80_get_pll4_factors() - calculates n, p, m factors for PLL1
> @@ -89,7 +104,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sun9i_a80_pll4_lock);
>
>   static void __init sun9i_a80_pll4_setup(struct device_node *node)
>   {
> -	sunxi_factors_register(node, &sun9i_a80_pll4_data, &sun9i_a80_pll4_lock);
> +	sun9i_factors_register(node, &sun9i_a80_pll4_data, &sun9i_a80_pll4_lock);
>   }
>   CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun9i_a80_pll4, "allwinner,sun9i-a80-pll4-clk", sun9i_a80_pll4_setup);
>
> @@ -139,8 +154,10 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sun9i_a80_gt_lock);
>
>   static void __init sun9i_a80_gt_setup(struct device_node *node)
>   {
> -	struct clk *gt = sunxi_factors_register(node, &sun9i_a80_gt_data,
> +	struct clk *gt = sun9i_factors_register(node, &sun9i_a80_gt_data,
>   						&sun9i_a80_gt_lock);
> +	if (!gt)
> +		return;
>
>   	/* The GT bus clock needs to be always enabled */
>   	__clk_get(gt);
> @@ -194,7 +211,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sun9i_a80_ahb_lock);
>
>   static void __init sun9i_a80_ahb_setup(struct device_node *node)
>   {
> -	sunxi_factors_register(node, &sun9i_a80_ahb_data, &sun9i_a80_ahb_lock);
> +	sun9i_factors_register(node, &sun9i_a80_ahb_data, &sun9i_a80_ahb_lock);
>   }
>   CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun9i_a80_ahb, "allwinner,sun9i-a80-ahb-clk", sun9i_a80_ahb_setup);
>
> @@ -210,7 +227,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sun9i_a80_apb0_lock);
>
>   static void __init sun9i_a80_apb0_setup(struct device_node *node)
>   {
> -	sunxi_factors_register(node, &sun9i_a80_apb0_data, &sun9i_a80_apb0_lock);
> +	sun9i_factors_register(node, &sun9i_a80_apb0_data, &sun9i_a80_apb0_lock);
>   }
>   CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun9i_a80_apb0, "allwinner,sun9i-a80-apb0-clk", sun9i_a80_apb0_setup);
>
> @@ -266,6 +283,6 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sun9i_a80_apb1_lock);
>
>   static void __init sun9i_a80_apb1_setup(struct device_node *node)
>   {
> -	sunxi_factors_register(node, &sun9i_a80_apb1_data, &sun9i_a80_apb1_lock);
> +	sun9i_factors_register(node, &sun9i_a80_apb1_data, &sun9i_a80_apb1_lock);
>   }
>   CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun9i_a80_apb1, "allwinner,sun9i-a80-apb1-clk", sun9i_a80_apb1_setup);
>