From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:27:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: arch_timer: Only use the virtual counter
 (CNTVCT) on arm64
In-Reply-To: <20141215105835.GC462@leverpostej>
References: <1418209329-28615-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>
 <548828C6.6030500@linaro.org> <20141215105835.GC462@leverpostej>
Message-ID: <548EE1C8.8080900@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Olof, Arnd,

Do you mind to apply this patch ?

I was about to take care of it but it depends on the commit:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git/commit/drivers/clocksource?h=for-next&id=0b46b8a718c6e90910a1b1b0fe797be3c167e186

Thanks
   -- Daniel



On 12/15/2014 11:58 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:04:38AM +0000, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 12/10/2014 12:02 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> Commit 0b46b8a718c6 (clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical
>>> timers when requested) introduces the use of physical counters in the
>>> ARM architected timer driver. However, he arm64 kernel uses CNTVCT in
>>> VDSO. When booting in EL2, the kernel switches to the physical timers to
>>> make things easier for KVM but it continues to use the virtual counter
>>> both in user and kernel. While in such scenario CNTVCT == CNTPCT (since
>>> CNTVOFF is initialised by the kernel to 0), we want to spot firmware
>>> bugs corrupting CNTVOFF early (which would affect CNTVCT).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>>> Tested-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
>>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Daniel,
>>>
>>> Do you plan to take this patch and push into mainline (ideally before -rc1)?
>>> Otherwise we can push it via the arm64 tree.
>>
>> I will take care of it.
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>>     -- Daniel
>
> What's the state of this patch?
>
> It doesn't seem to be in linux-next (next-20141215), which is failing to
> boot for me due to hitting the BUG in the arm64 arch_counter_get_cntpct.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Catalin
>>>
>>>
>>>    drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>> index 6a79fc4f900c..095c1774592c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
>>> @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
>>>
>>>    	/* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
>>>    	if (type & ARCH_CP15_TIMER) {
>>> -		if (arch_timer_use_virtual)
>>> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) || arch_timer_use_virtual)
>>>    			arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
>>>    		else
>>>    			arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>    <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
>>
>> Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
>> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
>> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog