linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ronald.wahl@raritan.com (Ronald Wahl)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH] usb: gadget: at91_udc: move prepare clk into process context
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:02:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54942FDC.8030404@raritan.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141219135123.GA2620@charon>

On 19.12.2014 14:51, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 01:50:49PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:37:27PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>> From: Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@raritan.com>
>>>
>>> Commit 7628083227b6bc4a7e33d7c381d7a4e558424b6b (usb: gadget: at91_udc:
>>> prepare clk before calling enable) added clock preparation in interrupt
>>> context. This is not allowed as it might sleep. Also setting the clock
>>> rate is unsafe to call from there for the same reason. Move clock
>>> preparation and setting clock rate into process context (at91udc_probe).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@raritan.com>
>>> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
>>> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
>>> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
>>> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.17+
>>> ---
>>> Hi Felipe,
>>>
>>> I forgot to answer you on this patch. So I resend it now with the proper
>>> "stable" tag. You can also queue it during this -rc phase if you feel it is
>>> still possible.
>>
>> I think it's late for v3.18, so it'll go on v3.19 and get backported to
>> 3.17 and 3.18. Sorry :-s
>>
>
> Although this commit (b2ba27a5c56f "usb: gadget: at91_udc: move
> prepare clk into process context") is tagged for stable v3.17+, it
> seems like it could be applied to earlier kernels.
>
> 3.16, 3.13 and 3.12 seem to be affected by the same issue (and they
> all include commit 7628083227b6 "usb: gadget: at91_udc: prepare clk
> before calling enable").  Is there any reason for not applying it in
> these trees?

Not to forget 3.14 (LTS) which was the branch where I primarily found 
the issue...

- ron

-- 
Ronald Wahl - ronald.wahl at raritan.com - Phone +49 375271349-0 Fax -99
Raritan Deutschland GmbH, Kornmarkt 7, 08056 Zwickau, Germany
USt-IdNr. DE813094160, Steuer-Nr. 227/117/01749
Amtsgericht Chemnitz HRB 23605
Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Stuart Hopper, Ralf Ploenes

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-19 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-19 15:37 [RESEND PATCH] usb: gadget: at91_udc: move prepare clk into process context Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-20 19:50 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-12-19 13:51   ` Luis Henriques
2014-12-19 14:02     ` Ronald Wahl [this message]
2014-12-19 14:08       ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-12-19 14:18         ` Luis Henriques
2014-12-22 16:43           ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-13 18:32     ` Kamal Mostafa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54942FDC.8030404@raritan.com \
    --to=ronald.wahl@raritan.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).