From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH] usb: gadget: at91_udc: move prepare clk into process context
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:08:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5494314F.1030002@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54942FDC.8030404@raritan.com>
Le 19/12/2014 15:02, Ronald Wahl a ?crit :
> On 19.12.2014 14:51, Luis Henriques wrote:
>> Hi Felipe,
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 01:50:49PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:37:27PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>>> From: Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@raritan.com>
>>>>
>>>> Commit 7628083227b6bc4a7e33d7c381d7a4e558424b6b (usb: gadget: at91_udc:
>>>> prepare clk before calling enable) added clock preparation in interrupt
>>>> context. This is not allowed as it might sleep. Also setting the clock
>>>> rate is unsafe to call from there for the same reason. Move clock
>>>> preparation and setting clock rate into process context (at91udc_probe).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@raritan.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
>>>> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
>>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.17+
>>>> ---
>>>> Hi Felipe,
>>>>
>>>> I forgot to answer you on this patch. So I resend it now with the proper
>>>> "stable" tag. You can also queue it during this -rc phase if you feel it is
>>>> still possible.
>>>
>>> I think it's late for v3.18, so it'll go on v3.19 and get backported to
>>> 3.17 and 3.18. Sorry :-s
>>>
>>
>> Although this commit (b2ba27a5c56f "usb: gadget: at91_udc: move
>> prepare clk into process context") is tagged for stable v3.17+, it
>> seems like it could be applied to earlier kernels.
>>
>> 3.16, 3.13 and 3.12 seem to be affected by the same issue (and they
>> all include commit 7628083227b6 "usb: gadget: at91_udc: prepare clk
>> before calling enable"). Is there any reason for not applying it in
>> these trees?
>
> Not to forget 3.14 (LTS) which was the branch where I primarily found
> the issue...
Well it's maybe an issue with the re-naming of the directory to
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/ introduced by patch:
90fccb529d24 (usb: gadget: Gadget directory cleanup - group UDC drivers)
The patch doesn't apply out of the box but it surely can be applied in
those earlier kernels.
Thanks, bye.
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-19 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-19 15:37 [RESEND PATCH] usb: gadget: at91_udc: move prepare clk into process context Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-20 19:50 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-12-19 13:51 ` Luis Henriques
2014-12-19 14:02 ` Ronald Wahl
2014-12-19 14:08 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2014-12-19 14:18 ` Luis Henriques
2014-12-22 16:43 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-13 18:32 ` Kamal Mostafa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5494314F.1030002@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).