From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregory.clement@free-electrons.com (Gregory CLEMENT) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:09:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 00/27] ARM: mvebu: armada-*: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11 In-Reply-To: <20141219160230.GZ967@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <1418657915-22775-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <54930BBC.4060602@free-electrons.com> <20141218191528.GY967@titan.lakedaemon.net> <549437DD.7040602@free-electrons.com> <20141219160230.GZ967@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <54944DAC.1000709@free-electrons.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 19/12/2014 17:02, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:36:13PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >> On 18/12/2014 20:15, Jason Cooper wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 06:15:40PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >>> ... >>>> Jason at the end it seems you didn't ack or nack the patches were you >>>> were CC. You expressed some concerns about the GPLv2+ move but I don't know >>>> if it is something that prevents you to give your acked-by. >>> >>> Oops. :) I figured my S-o-B when applying would be sufficient. That >>> decision was before we decided on Andrew applying patches this time >>> around... >>> >>> For all my dts{i} contributions: >>> >>> Acked-by: Jason Cooper >> >> Thanks :) >> >>> >>> Due to all the merge commits over time and whatnot, it's probably best >>> to put my Ack on all the patches in this series... >> >> OK no problem. By the way, I take care of collecting all the acked-by and >> once it will be done I will either sent the updated patch set with all the >> acked-by or maybe just I will create a branch to pull if it is easier to handle. > > Ok, that'll be up to Andrew. > > Once we have the last few stragglers, and assuming there are no more > NAKs, here's what I'd like to do: > > Regrettably, we'll have to revert Simon's dts contributions. I say You missed the email he sent yesterday, finally Simon changed his mind and gave his acked-by. > 'regret' in that I regret having to potentially discourage a valuable > contributor. I *don't* regret him sticking to his guns. :) > > As for what to do after that, I think we (the core mvebu folks) should > *not* rewrite the Lacie dts files. That just seems hinky to me. > > If there's community interest, someone will crop up who copies one of > the dual licensed dts files and modifies it to boot his/her Lacie board. > When they submit a patch, we'll DCO/SoB double check them and apply the > patch(es). > > > thx, > > Jason. > -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com