From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo) Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 19:21:53 +0800 Subject: =?gbk?Q?=B4=F0=B8=B4=3A_=5BPATCH_v6_17/17=5D_Documen?= =?gbk?Q?tation=3A_ACPI_for_ARM64?= In-Reply-To: References: <1420368918-5086-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1420368918-5086-18-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Message-ID: <54ABC551.3080005@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Yi, On 2015?01?06? 17:52, liyi 00215672 wrote: > In traditional telecom market, what confused us(Huawei) was our software and > hardware coupling together oftentimes. So if we change some hardware then we > MUST modify our software, which was not our customer?s expectation. In x86 world, > we have UEFI and ACPI technologies, they are suitable to solve this problem very > well, we just upgrade our hardware and don?t need to upgrade their software, > in the meantime ACPI provides many methods on power management. > > In ARM64 world, we are aiming the same thing. Following the SBBR,SBSA specs > to implement our UEFI and ACPI code, we think the patch set and arm-acpi > documentation are fine , and consider it is going on the right direction, so > > Reviewed-by: Yi Li Thanks a lot! Regards, Hanjun