From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: panand@redhat.com (Pratyush Anand) Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 23:03:08 +0530 Subject: [RFC 2/8] ARM64: Refactor kprobes-arm64 In-Reply-To: <20150108165557.GQ11583@arm.com> References: <9a86c217f387f45568c18b724024b0d3e040d2c6.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com> <20150108165557.GQ11583@arm.com> Message-ID: <54AEBF54.7000704@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 08 January 2015 10:25 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 03:21:18PM +0000, Pratyush Anand wrote: >> Most of the stuff of kprobes-arm64.c can also be used by uprobes.c. So >> move all those part to common code area. In the process rename kprobe to >> probe whereever possible. >> >> No functional change. > > In which case, can you merge this into the kprobes series (which we haven't > merged yet)? > Yes, thats why these are just RFCs. I will send next version of uprobe only after kprobe patches are accepted into maintainer's tree. ~Pratyush > Will > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >