From: panand@redhat.com (Pratyush Anand)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 6/8] ARM64: Handle TRAP_HWBRKPT for user mode as well
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 23:21:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AEC3A4.9010709@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150108170152.GS11583@arm.com>
On Thursday 08 January 2015 10:31 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 06:05:23PM +0000, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> Let me repeat once again that I know absolutely nothing about arm* ;)
>>
>> On 12/31, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>>>
>>> uprobe registers a handler at step_hook. So, single_step_handler now
>>> checks for user mode as well if there is a valid hook.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
>>> index b056369fd47d..2676b8655241 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
>>> @@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
>>> if (!reinstall_suspended_bps(regs))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> + if (call_step_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> if (user_mode(regs)) {
>>> info.si_signo = SIGTRAP;
>>> info.si_errno = 0;
>>> @@ -251,9 +254,6 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
>>> */
>>> user_rewind_single_step(current);
>>> } else {
>>> - if (call_step_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
>>> - return 0;
>>> -
>>
>> Agreed, we need something like this change...
>>
>> But did you verify that it can't break other users of register_step_hook() ?
>> The current handlers do not check user_mode() == F, they assume that they
>> can't be called otherwise.
>>
>> If this all is correct, please explain why in the changelog.
>
> I think you're right, and kgdb will need fixing with this change.
OK, I will fix kgdb too when I will send next revision.
~Pratyush
>
> Will
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-08 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-31 15:21 [RFC 0/8] ARM64: Uprobe support added Pratyush Anand
2015-01-01 1:59 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <c40bb09f1edad6899c3855eb56bf4a4f541c49f7.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-02 17:43 ` [RFC 3/8] Kernel/uprobe: Define arch_uprobe_exception_notify as __weak Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:50 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <f41f96aaed90007076ce496b9a0746c6f1a01ddb.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-02 17:51 ` [RFC 5/8] ARM64: Re-factor flush_ptrace_access Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-02 18:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:50 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <1e0a9e778669bb2a2e40bf101eff8ae85110ce54.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-02 18:05 ` [RFC 6/8] ARM64: Handle TRAP_HWBRKPT for user mode as well Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-08 17:01 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:51 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
[not found] ` <5beb1ff58d4928a873be5e898b62d8cc2003ec7c.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-08 16:55 ` [RFC 1/8] ARM64: Move BRK opcodes defines from kprobes.h to insn.h Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:31 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <9a86c217f387f45568c18b724024b0d3e040d2c6.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-08 16:55 ` [RFC 2/8] ARM64: Refactor kprobes-arm64 Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:33 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 17:36 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:39 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <028aab951a24c56075b1060afa1c2b2d88c09083.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-08 16:59 ` [RFC 4/8] ARM64: Add instruction_pointer_set function Will Deacon
2015-01-09 5:18 ` Pratyush Anand
[not found] ` <0694af6935f9c6873ef8d25ad51630a40a74a116.1420038188.git.panand@redhat.com>
2015-01-02 17:23 ` [RFC 8/8] ARM64: Add uprobe support Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-04 13:49 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-04 18:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-05 4:17 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-08 17:03 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-08 17:54 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-09 17:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12 4:50 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-09 17:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12 5:04 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-12 6:45 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-01-12 14:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-01-12 14:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54AEC3A4.9010709@redhat.com \
--to=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).