linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: maxime.coquelin@st.com (Maxime Coquelin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 15:44:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AFE968.4010805@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54AFC2A8.1010807@st.com>

With Maxime in the To: list.


On 01/09/2015 12:59 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Tyler, Maxime,
>
> On 01/08/2015 01:54 AM, Tyler Baker wrote:
>> Call spin_lock_init() before the spinlocks are used, preventing a 
>> lockdep
>> splat.
>>
>> I have been observing lockdep complaining [1] during boot on my a80 
>> optimus [2]
>> when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING has been enabled. This patch resolves the 
>> splat,
>> and has been tested on a few other sunxi platforms without issue.
>>
>> [1] 
>> http://storage.kernelci.org/next/next-20150107/arm-multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y/lab-tbaker/boot-sun9i-a80-optimus.html
>> [2] http://kernelci.org/boot/?a80-optimus
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> This patch was tested on 3.19.0-rc3
>>
>>   drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>> index eebc52c..e37250c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>> @@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ static int sunxi_reset_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>       if (IS_ERR(data->membase))
>>           return PTR_ERR(data->membase);
>>   +    spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
>> +
> Shouldn't the lock be initialized also in early init function 
> (sunxi_reset_init) ?
>
> Regards,
> Maxime
>>       data->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>       data->rcdev.nr_resets = resource_size(res) * 32;
>>       data->rcdev.ops = &sunxi_reset_ops;
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-09 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-08  0:54 [PATCH] reset: sunxi: fix spinlock initialization Tyler Baker
2015-01-08  9:09 ` Philipp Zabel
2015-01-08  9:30 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-01-09  6:38   ` Tyler Baker
2015-01-09 11:59 ` Maxime Coquelin
2015-01-09 14:44   ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2015-01-09 20:44     ` Tyler Baker
2015-01-10  0:22       ` Tyler Baker
2015-01-12  8:37         ` Philipp Zabel
2015-01-13  8:59         ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54AFE968.4010805@st.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@st.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).